Homepage Fill a Valid Da 2166 9 1 Form
Contents

The DA 2166-9-1 form plays a crucial role in the evaluation process for Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) within the U.S. Army. This evaluation report is designed specifically for Sergeants and serves as a comprehensive tool to assess their performance and potential. It includes various sections that capture essential administrative data, such as the NCO’s name, rank, and unit, along with a detailed duty description that outlines their responsibilities and areas of emphasis. The form also requires input from both the rater and senior rater, who provide insights into the NCO's professionalism, attributes, and competencies. Key performance metrics, including physical fitness assessments and adherence to Army values, are documented to ensure a well-rounded evaluation. The DA 2166-9-1 not only facilitates feedback but also supports the development of NCOs by highlighting their strengths and areas for improvement. Furthermore, the inclusion of a supplementary reviewer allows for an additional layer of oversight, ensuring that evaluations are thorough and fair. Understanding this form is essential for both evaluators and those being evaluated, as it directly impacts career progression and opportunities within the Army.

Similar forms

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an important document used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. There are several other forms that serve similar purposes in evaluating performance and documenting personnel actions. Here’s a look at six such forms:

  • DA Form 67-9: This is the Officer Evaluation Report (OER) used for evaluating commissioned officers. Like the DA Form 2166-9-1, it assesses performance and potential, focusing on leadership qualities and professional development.
  • DA Form 1059: The Academic Evaluation Report (AER) is used for documenting the performance of soldiers attending military schools. It shares similarities in that it evaluates a soldier's academic performance and includes comments from instructors, much like the evaluations in DA Form 2166-9-1.
  • DA Form 4856: This form is used for counseling sessions and is crucial for documenting the development of soldiers. It parallels the DA Form 2166-9-1 in that both emphasize the importance of feedback and communication between leaders and their subordinates.
  • Ohio Unclaimed Form: This form is crucial for individuals looking to reclaim lost assets, similar to how the DA 2166 9 1 assesses NCO performance and potential. For assistance with the process, visit All Ohio Forms.
  • DA Form 7000: The Request for Leave form is used to document leave requests. While not directly an evaluation form, it is similar in that it requires administrative data and verification by superiors, much like the DA Form 2166-9-1.
  • DA Form 7566: This is the Senior Enlisted Evaluation Report (SEER), which evaluates senior enlisted personnel. It shares the same purpose of assessing leadership and performance, similar to the DA Form 2166-9-1.
  • DA Form 2166-9-2: This form is used for evaluating NCOs at higher ranks. It is similar in structure and purpose, focusing on performance and potential, but is tailored for more senior positions compared to the DA Form 2166-9-1.

Each of these forms plays a vital role in the evaluation process within the Army, ensuring that personnel are assessed fairly and consistently.

Document Example

HQDA#:

Attachments Menu

NCO EVALUATION REPORT (SGT)

For use of this form, see AR 623-­3 and DA PAM 623-­3 the proponent agency is DCS, G-­1.

SEE PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT

IN AR 623-­3

PART I ADMINISTRATIVE DATA

a.NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)

b. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

c. RANK

d. DATE OF RANK

e. PMOSC

f. UNIT, ORG, STATION, ZIP CODE OR APO, MAJOR COMMAND

g. STATUS CODE

h. UIC

i. REASON FOR SUBMISSION

j. PERIOD COVERED

FROMTHRU

YEAR MONTH DAY

YEAR MONTH DAY

k.RATED MONTHS

l.NONRATED CODES

m. NO OF ENCLOSURES

n. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

PART II AUTHENTICATION

a1. NAME OF RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)

a2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

a3. RATER'S SIGNATURE

a4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

a5. RANK

PMOSC/BRANCH

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

a6. RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

b1. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)

b2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

b3. SENIOR RATER'S SIGNATURE

b4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

b5. RANK

PMOSC/BRANCH

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

b6. SENIOR RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

c1. SUPPLEMENTARY

c2. NAME OF SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER

c3. RANK

PMOSC/

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

REVIEW REQUIRED?

(Last, First, Middle Initial)

 

 

BRANCH

 

 

 

YES

NO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c4. COMMENTS

 

c5. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S SIGNATURE

c6. DATE(YYYYMMDD)

 

c7. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS

ENCLOSED?

 

 

 

 

 

 

(.gov or .mil)

 

YES

NO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATED NCO: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the assessments of the rater and senior rater. I further understand my signature verifies that the administrative data in Part I, the rating officials and counseling dates in Part II, the duty description in Part III, and the APFT and height/weight entries in Part IVa and IVb are correct. I have seen the completed report. I am aware of the appeals process of AR 623-­3.

d1. COUNSELING DATES INITIAL

LATER

LATER

LATER

d2. RATED NCO'S SIGNATURE

d3. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

PART III DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)

a. PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE

b. DUTY MOSC

c.DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include, as appropriate, people, equipment, facilities, and dollars)

d.AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS

e.APPOINTED DUTIES

PART IV PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, PROFESSIONALISM, ATTRIBUTES, AND COMPETENCIES (Rater)

a. APFT Pass/Fail/Profile:

Date:

b. Height:

Weight:

Within Standard?

(Comments required for "Failed" APFT, "No" APFT, or "Profile" when it precludes performance of duty, and "No" for Army Weight Standards.) Reset Item a. APFT/Pass/Fail/Profile

c.CHARACTER: (Include bullet comments addressing Rated NCO's performance as it relates to adherence to Army Values, Empathy, Warrior Ethos/Service Ethos, and Discipline. Fully supports SHARP, EO, and EEO.)

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

COMMENTS:

DA FORM 2166-­9-­1, NOV 2015

Page 1 of 2

APD LC v1.00ES

RATED NCO'S NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)

SSN (or DOD ID No.)

THRU DATE

 

 

 

PART IV PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, PROFESSIONALISM, ATTRIBUTES, AND COMPETENCIES (Rater)

d. PRESENCE: (Military and professional

COMMENTS:

bearing, Fitness, Confidence, Resilience.)

 

MET

DID NOT MEET

 

STANDARD

STANDARD

 

e. INTELLECT: (Mental agility, Sound judgment, COMMENTS:

Innovation, Interpersonal tact, Expertise.)

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

f. LEADS: (Leads others, Builds trust, Extends COMMENTS:

influence beyond the chain of command, Leads by

example Communicates.)

 

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

g. DEVELOPS: (Creates a positive command/ COMMENTS:

workplace environment, Fosters esprit de corps,

Prepares self, Develops others, Stewards the

profession.)

 

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

 

 

h. ACHIEVES: (Gets results.)

COMMENTS:

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATER OVERALL PERFORMANCE

 

i. I currently rate

NCOs in this grade.

 

COMMENTS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART V SENIOR RATER OVERALL POTENTIAL

a. Select one box representing Rated

b. COMMENTS:

 

NCO’s potential compared to others in the

 

 

same grade whom you have rated in your

 

 

career. I currently senior rate

 

 

NCOs in this grade.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MOST QUALIFIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

HIGHLY QUALIFIED

 

 

QUALIFIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOT QUALIFIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c. List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment (3-­5 years).

 

Successive Assignment:

1)

 

 

2)

Broadening Assignment:

 

 

 

DA FORM 2166-­9-­1, NOV 2015

 

Page 2 of 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APD PE v1.00ES

Form Specs

Fact Name Description
Form Purpose The DA 2166-9-1 form is used for evaluating the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the rank of Sergeant.
Governing Regulations This form is governed by Army Regulation (AR) 623-3 and DA Pamphlet (PAM) 623-3.
Privacy Act Statement Users must refer to the Privacy Act Statement included in AR 623-3 to understand how personal information is protected.
Administrative Data Part I of the form collects essential administrative data, including the rated NCO's name, SSN, rank, and unit information.
Performance Evaluation Part IV assesses various competencies, including character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement.
Signature Requirement The rated NCO must sign the form to acknowledge that they have seen the completed report and understand the appeals process.

Crucial Questions on This Form

What is the purpose of the DA 2166 9 1 form?

The DA 2166 9 1 form is used for evaluating non-commissioned officers (NCOs) in the rank of Sergeant. This evaluation report helps assess an NCO's performance, professionalism, and potential for future assignments. It serves as an official record that can impact promotions, assignments, and career progression.

Who needs to complete the DA 2166 9 1 form?

The form must be completed by the rater, who is typically the immediate supervisor of the rated NCO. Additionally, a senior rater is involved in the evaluation process, providing an overall assessment of the NCO's potential. The rated NCO also has a role in verifying the information and acknowledging the evaluation.

What information is required in Part I of the form?

Part I collects essential administrative data, including:

  • Name of the rated NCO
  • Social Security Number or DOD ID Number
  • Rank and Date of Rank
  • Unit and Organization details
  • Period covered by the evaluation
  • Email address of the rated NCO

This information ensures that the evaluation is accurately attributed to the correct individual.

How does the evaluation process work?

The evaluation process begins with the rater assessing the NCO's performance based on various criteria, including leadership and professionalism. The senior rater then reviews this evaluation, providing their insights and overall potential assessment. The rated NCO has the opportunity to sign the form, indicating they have seen the completed report, though this signature does not imply agreement with the ratings.

What are the key areas evaluated in Part IV?

Part IV focuses on several critical performance areas, including:

  1. Character
  2. Presence
  3. Intellect
  4. Leadership
  5. Development of others
  6. Achievement of results

Each area is assessed as either meeting or not meeting standards, with comments provided to support the ratings. This comprehensive evaluation helps paint a complete picture of the NCO's capabilities.

What happens if an NCO disagrees with their evaluation?

If an NCO disagrees with their evaluation, they have the right to appeal the assessment. The appeals process is outlined in AR 623-3, and it allows the NCO to formally contest the evaluation. It's important for NCOs to be aware of this process and to gather any supporting documentation that may help their case.

How often is the DA 2166 9 1 form completed?

The DA 2166 9 1 form is typically completed annually or at the end of a specific rating period. However, it may also be submitted when there are significant changes in the NCO's duties or if they are being considered for a new assignment. Regular evaluations help maintain an accurate and up-to-date assessment of an NCO's performance.

Documents used along the form

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an essential document used for evaluating non-commissioned officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. Several other forms and documents often accompany this evaluation report to provide additional information or fulfill specific requirements. Below is a list of commonly used forms and documents that may be relevant.

  • DA Form 1059: This form is used to document the completion of military training courses. It provides a summary of the training, including the course title, dates, and the individual's performance.
  • DA Form 4856: This is a developmental counseling form used to document counseling sessions between leaders and soldiers. It helps track performance, set goals, and address any issues.
  • Ohio Horse Bill of Sale: For those engaging in equine transactions, our detailed Horse Bill of Sale form guide is essential for legal and accurate documentation.
  • DA Form 670-1: This form is utilized for the wear and appearance of Army uniforms and insignia. It provides guidelines on proper uniform wear and appearance standards.
  • DA Form 2-1: The personnel qualification record, which contains an individual's military career information, including assignments, training, and qualifications.
  • DA Form 7500: This document is used to report and track individual training requirements and completion for soldiers, ensuring they meet necessary qualifications.
  • DA Form 4187: This form is used for requests for personnel actions, such as reassignments, promotions, and other administrative actions affecting soldiers.
  • DA Form 3349: The physical profile form, which documents an individual's physical limitations or medical conditions that may affect their duty performance.
  • DA Form 268: This form is used for initiating a flag (suspension of favorable actions) for soldiers who are under investigation or have other administrative issues.
  • DA Form 600-8-22: This document provides information on awards and decorations, including eligibility criteria and procedures for requesting awards.
  • DA Form 7500-1: This is an individual development plan that outlines a soldier's career goals and the steps needed to achieve them, including training and education opportunities.

These forms and documents play a significant role in the overall evaluation and administrative processes within the Army. They help ensure that all necessary information is available for accurate assessments and decision-making regarding personnel management.

Misconceptions

Understanding the DA 2166 9 1 form can be challenging, and several misconceptions often arise regarding its purpose and usage. Below are eight common misunderstandings, each clarified for better comprehension.

  • The form is only for NCOs in the Army. Many believe that the DA 2166 9 1 is exclusive to Army Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs). However, it is utilized across various branches of the military for similar evaluation purposes.
  • It serves solely as a performance report. While the primary function of the form is to evaluate performance, it also includes administrative data and feedback mechanisms that are crucial for professional development.
  • Signatures indicate agreement with the evaluation. A common myth is that signing the form means the rated NCO agrees with the assessments. In reality, the signature confirms that the administrative details are accurate, not necessarily that the evaluations are accepted.
  • All sections must be filled out completely. Some think that every section of the form is mandatory. In fact, certain parts can be left blank if they do not apply to the rated NCO’s situation.
  • The form is only relevant during annual evaluations. Many assume that the DA 2166 9 1 is only used once a year. However, it can be utilized for various evaluations throughout the year, particularly during significant changes in duty assignments or responsibilities.
  • Performance evaluations are solely subjective. There is a belief that evaluations lack objectivity. In truth, the form includes specific criteria and metrics, such as APFT results and other quantifiable data, which guide the evaluation process.
  • Only the rater can provide feedback. Some individuals think that only the rater has the authority to offer comments. In reality, the rated NCO has the opportunity to provide input and feedback, fostering a more collaborative evaluation process.
  • The appeals process is complicated and rarely used. A misconception exists that the appeals process is overly complex and seldom utilized. In fact, the process is designed to be accessible, allowing NCOs to contest evaluations they believe are inaccurate.

By addressing these misconceptions, individuals can better navigate the complexities of the DA 2166 9 1 form and ensure a more accurate and beneficial evaluation process.